<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Immersive Entertainment, New Media, and Storytelling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.purplecar.net/2007/10/10/immersive-entertainment-new-media-and-storytelling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2007/10/10/immersive-entertainment-new-media-and-storytelling/</link>
	<description>A Taxi Service for Big Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PurpleCar</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2007/10/10/immersive-entertainment-new-media-and-storytelling/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>PurpleCar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=75#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Hey Michael, thanks for commenting!  your points reminded me of what it is really like on the business side of things: very conservative, not experimental.  It will be a while for statistics to be gathered or even identified, before the old fogies spend their hard-stolen dollars on a $30,000/year position like Internet Writer.  It&#039;s a shame, though, because the shelf-life on the &quot;immersion&#039; storytelling fun is short, and they are gonna miss it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Michael, thanks for commenting!  your points reminded me of what it is really like on the business side of things: very conservative, not experimental.  It will be a while for statistics to be gathered or even identified, before the old fogies spend their hard-stolen dollars on a $30,000/year position like Internet Writer.  It&#8217;s a shame, though, because the shelf-life on the &#8220;immersion&#8217; storytelling fun is short, and they are gonna miss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2007/10/10/immersive-entertainment-new-media-and-storytelling/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=75#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I really think that it will still be awhile before the large media places actually understand this new media space - 

The reason that I think that is because if you take a look around at some of the conversations taking place by the people who are creating this space, things like semantics are still being discussed - 

There are still conversations taking place as to whether or not we should call it &quot;podcasting&quot; and there are other conversations happening where the validity of social networks are being discussed and mostly emotional responses can be found - nothing statistical for the most part.

So, if the people creating the space cannot even seem to understand things, who &quot;out there&quot; can possibly begin to understand it for themselves.

I love speaking in an open, tongue-in-cheek way, mostly because I realize that there aren&#039;t any real answers at this point - that may not really be a problem, as it seems that  some people have already been able to capitalize on this space by only focusing on one or two elements of the big picture - that&#039;s a good thing, and really makes a lot of sense.

example, A race car driver doesn&#039;t need to know how the engine works, as long as he can drive and win races.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think that it will still be awhile before the large media places actually understand this new media space &#8211; </p>
<p>The reason that I think that is because if you take a look around at some of the conversations taking place by the people who are creating this space, things like semantics are still being discussed &#8211; </p>
<p>There are still conversations taking place as to whether or not we should call it &#8220;podcasting&#8221; and there are other conversations happening where the validity of social networks are being discussed and mostly emotional responses can be found &#8211; nothing statistical for the most part.</p>
<p>So, if the people creating the space cannot even seem to understand things, who &#8220;out there&#8221; can possibly begin to understand it for themselves.</p>
<p>I love speaking in an open, tongue-in-cheek way, mostly because I realize that there aren&#8217;t any real answers at this point &#8211; that may not really be a problem, as it seems that  some people have already been able to capitalize on this space by only focusing on one or two elements of the big picture &#8211; that&#8217;s a good thing, and really makes a lot of sense.</p>
<p>example, A race car driver doesn&#8217;t need to know how the engine works, as long as he can drive and win races.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PurpleCar</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2007/10/10/immersive-entertainment-new-media-and-storytelling/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>PurpleCar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=75#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Marina, thanks for commenting.  And I agree, I would think ABC would use the blog to create more intrigue, e.g. dropping foreshadowing hints and such, inner monologue like &quot;He doesn&#039;t know it yet, but I&#039;m pregnant,&quot; etc, and that in turn would get more viewers and more consistent viewership.  With soap operas, a viewer can skip a few episodes and still catch up quickly.  If I were on the writing and/or advertising team, I would go after that new generation of viewers that are on-line longer than they watch TV. 

I tuned into Steve Garfield&#039;s live feed the other day - I followed his Tweet to a conference he was at - and the social media experts were mentioning examples of artists and filmmakers who had made work available &quot;for free&quot; on-line; instead of this devaluing their work, prices for it actually went up.  In the new media market, the old adages about &quot;giving it away&quot; aren&#039;t relevant in today&#039;s world.   

I wish storytelling media outlets like the major networks would hire more writers (with a technical bent, like me!) to write Tweets, character blogs, and other immersive new media.  Perhaps the job title could be &quot;Staff Internet Writer&quot; and the writer&#039;s sole duty would be to keep up the on-line presence of the character in order to enhance the story experience.  When will the stodgy old boardroom members wake up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marina, thanks for commenting.  And I agree, I would think ABC would use the blog to create more intrigue, e.g. dropping foreshadowing hints and such, inner monologue like &#8220;He doesn&#8217;t know it yet, but I&#8217;m pregnant,&#8221; etc, and that in turn would get more viewers and more consistent viewership.  With soap operas, a viewer can skip a few episodes and still catch up quickly.  If I were on the writing and/or advertising team, I would go after that new generation of viewers that are on-line longer than they watch TV. </p>
<p>I tuned into Steve Garfield&#8217;s live feed the other day &#8211; I followed his Tweet to a conference he was at &#8211; and the social media experts were mentioning examples of artists and filmmakers who had made work available &#8220;for free&#8221; on-line; instead of this devaluing their work, prices for it actually went up.  In the new media market, the old adages about &#8220;giving it away&#8221; aren&#8217;t relevant in today&#8217;s world.   </p>
<p>I wish storytelling media outlets like the major networks would hire more writers (with a technical bent, like me!) to write Tweets, character blogs, and other immersive new media.  Perhaps the job title could be &#8220;Staff Internet Writer&#8221; and the writer&#8217;s sole duty would be to keep up the on-line presence of the character in order to enhance the story experience.  When will the stodgy old boardroom members wake up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina @ Sufficient Thrust</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2007/10/10/immersive-entertainment-new-media-and-storytelling/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina @ Sufficient Thrust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 03:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=75#comment-17</guid>
		<description>(Damn. I hit Enter before I finished typing...)

I have been an on-again, off-again fan of the soap opera &quot;General Hospital&quot; for almost 13 years now. There is a blog &quot;written&quot; by one of the veteran characters on the show. Problem is, I think ABC always puts *just* enough effort into these endeavors, and it falls short. Soap opera fans in particular are VERY loyal and passionate about the show, staging campaigns over love matches and such. When you write a half-assed blog that doesn&#039;t sound like it&#039;s from the character at all (not to mention their INCORRECT story summaries), I think it&#039;s a bigger turnoff than not doing anything at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Damn. I hit Enter before I finished typing&#8230;)</p>
<p>I have been an on-again, off-again fan of the soap opera &#8220;General Hospital&#8221; for almost 13 years now. There is a blog &#8220;written&#8221; by one of the veteran characters on the show. Problem is, I think ABC always puts *just* enough effort into these endeavors, and it falls short. Soap opera fans in particular are VERY loyal and passionate about the show, staging campaigns over love matches and such. When you write a half-assed blog that doesn&#8217;t sound like it&#8217;s from the character at all (not to mention their INCORRECT story summaries), I think it&#8217;s a bigger turnoff than not doing anything at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina @ Sufficient Thrust</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2007/10/10/immersive-entertainment-new-media-and-storytelling/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina @ Sufficient Thrust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 03:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=75#comment-16</guid>
		<description>My first love was Amory Blaine from F. Scott Fitzgerald&#039;s &quot;This Side of Paradise.&quot; I could read that book forever and not notice the years passing by. Kazuo Ishiguro&#039;s books, particularly &quot;The Remains of the Day,&quot; are also like that. I call them *sumptuous* books.

I don&#039;t know if I&#039;d want to be immersed in them, though. Reading about a butler driving through the English countryside contemplating what it means to be a good butler made for good reading, but would probably be a bore IRL. Per usual, fantasy is (far) better than the reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first love was Amory Blaine from F. Scott Fitzgerald&#8217;s &#8220;This Side of Paradise.&#8221; I could read that book forever and not notice the years passing by. Kazuo Ishiguro&#8217;s books, particularly &#8220;The Remains of the Day,&#8221; are also like that. I call them *sumptuous* books.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;d want to be immersed in them, though. Reading about a butler driving through the English countryside contemplating what it means to be a good butler made for good reading, but would probably be a bore IRL. Per usual, fantasy is (far) better than the reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
