How Do Memes Start? A Case Study: 100 Books in Facebook.

by Christine Cavalier on 2 March 2009

A “meme” is a little chain-letter-like game that people send around the internet.  You may have heard of Facebook’s latest meme “25 Things” (that was started by users, not the Facebook staff).

Ever wonder how these memes begin?

Let’s use the 100 Book meme that is hitting Facebook this week.  It’s a good study on how memes get started, how they change over time, and how they grow.

I just caught this from FriendFeed user Mark Dykeman:

“This is one of those Facebook memes that keeps circling around the universe.  I answered it on Facebook, but since some of you might not have access to my Facebook account, I thought I’d post the results here.

‘The BBC believes the majority of people will have only read 6 of the 100 books here.
Go to your profile, choose notes, post a new note – copy and edit.

Instructions: Look at the list and put an ‘x’ after those you have read.’”

Mark goes ahead and checks off the books he’s read on the list.  It’s more than 6.  The list is below, but hang here with me for a second.

Before you get your feathers ruffled about the audacity and snobbery of the BBC, let’s take a better look at this.

I looked for the origin of the meme by checking urban-myth-busting site Snopes and the BBC website.  Snopes had nothing about how the BBC supposedly claimed that most people will have read only 6 books on the entire list.  Snopes usually catches rumors quickly, but they don’t necessarily investigate every silly Facebook meme.  Personally, I doubt the BBC would have said that, but let’s be honest:  They’ve said worse.

On the BBC site I found no quotes, articles, or any mention whatsoever about the 6 book number; I did find the BBC’s BIG READ list where they list 100 books and they ask UK’ers to vote on their favorites.  Both the list from the Facebook meme and the BBC’s Big Read list look similar.  Could they be the same list?

So I stuck them in a spreadsheet and compared.   63 of the books are shared;  37 of the books are not.

Here is the shared list (click to embiggen):

63 FB List titles on left, 63 BBC List titles on right.  This list contains exactly the same books, with titles edited.

63 FB List titles on left, 63 BBC List titles on right. This list contains exactly the same books, with titles edited.

You’ll notice some of the book titles are written slightly differently, which implies more editing by the clever meme maker (who’ll we’ll refer to as the Facebook Meme Maker -FMM) that adjusted the original BBC list.  (With the Facebook Meme’s “Harry Potter Series” entry, I just used the first Harry Potter book.  Same with “The Faraway Tree Collection.”  In a list of 100 books, it’s confusing to reference a series.)

So this table (click on it then zoom in to see better) contains the 63 shared titles.  That means 37 titles were deleted and new ones added by the Facebook Meme Maker.

Here are the remaining 37 titles from the Facebook meme next to the original 37 from BBC list (click to embiggen):

37 FB List titles on left, 37 BBC List titles on right.  The lists don't share titles.

37 FB List titles on left, 37 BBC List titles on right. The lists don't share titles.

Seems like FMM preferred more American authors and books that were later adapted into successful movies.  Maybe FMM heard some rumor that the BBC was dissing American authors and readers and felt like putting some of her/his own favorites on the list.  Who knows?

But this meme has some of the great signs of a viral commodity:

1. The meme’s subject is elitist in that it says something about the user’s level of intelligence. (“What? You haven’t read War and Peace?!)  This fosters (usually friendly) competition amongst friends.

2. The meme has a whiff of injustice that stirs up indignance. (“How DARE the BBC say that?! GIMME THAT LIST!”)

3. Filling out / answering the meme doesn’t take much time.  “Put an X by the books you’ve read.”

4. 100 books is perfect.  A nice, big milestone number.  “16 Things” (which I filled out) didn’t take off on Facebook but “25 Things” did.  People gravitate toward milestone, lucky, and zero-ending numbers in this culture.  No-one will look at an “82 Books You Need to Read” list.  “100″ grabs everyone’s attention.

The FMM probably saw the BBC list and wondered how many of the books she/he had actually read.  Out of curiosity, the FMM checked off which book titles were familiar.  Perhaps when the number of recognized titles were low, the FMM decided to add the ones she/he did in fact read.  What followed was an email or two, with bragging evidence attached, of course, to a few dozen friends on Facebook.  Voila!  A meme is born.

People who successfully ignore memes will be sucked into this one for the false academic quality of it.  It’s about traditional literacy; We all take the “How Well Read Are You?” measurement quite seriously.

I myself am trying to work on being better read.  With all the hype about how the internet and tv are melting our brains, this meme is a zinger.  It feeds all the fear surrounding the changes in our culture.  It will most likely take off and get so big that Snopes will have to post on it.

Now you know how memes like this start.  And you also know why I’m not going to be sucked in.  It’s a hoax created by a smart FMM who blended some pop culture news story from half-way across the world into a pride-ruffling insult that must be disproved immediately by the educated American masses.  Have fun with it if you like, but please don’t spread the indignant attitude.  Reading itself should be a positive and inclusive activity.

Google Buzz

  • VisitorPA
    Nice post!! I read it before I did the FB-meme. But I'm such an elitist, I think I'm going to do it anyway -- I always feel crappy when the sports ones come around :-)
  • LOL on the sports... at quizzo I was totally and utterly useless when the sports questions came up. Then again, I wasn't all that great at any other subject, either!

    Peace!
    -PurpleCar
    http://www.purplecar.net/
  • Anonymous
    No worries, Jillian and Ari! It's just too tempting to ignore. Goes straight to the ego, it's like we have no defenses against it! Especially when it throws in those dirty Brits, right? LOL have fun with it, just don't go burning up Shakespeare in effigy. :) Thanks for coming to comment!
  • Sigh. Like Mark Dykeman earlier up the comments trail, I'd already fallen prey. Thanks to Jillian, someone I tagged, for pointing me here.
  • What a relief! As a verifiable snob, I turned my nose up at the list on the Facebook meme. I mean, "The Time Traveler's Wife," seriously? Hardly literature. And FOUR Dickens? Blech. Thankfully, the original list is significantly better.
  • Ya know what, classhumorist, after all this conversation, I'm giving up on obtaining a "certain degree of cultural literacy." Screw it. I'll read the new Dan Brown book when it comes out next week and enjoy it. I'm thrilled and proud to be a member of the middle class, as I started out in the working poor. How well-read a person is a concern for the upper echelon Bourgeois, and none of my concern. I pride myself on being able to carry on a conversation with anyone, and the secrets to that skill don't reside in book learning. If the person I'm speaking with chooses to look down on my Goodreads.com list, then I'll move on to talking with someone else. Maybe I'm just getting older and learning how to accept myself more.

    As for Collin's reference, that one must have slipped by me, as our public library system here in the suburbs of Philadelphia, PA, USA, is actually quite good.

    Thanks for coming & commenting!

    -PC
  • classhumorist
    PurpleCar -

    Thanks for doing the legwork on this. I aspire to a certain degree of cultural literacy, but the idea of being told what I should have read is abhorrent to me. For example, I've read "Atlas Shrugged" but it was not on that list. As such *I* claim superiority over the compiler of the list as an understanding of objectivism will stand me better in society than... say... my ability to quote passages from "Bridget Jones' Diary".

    BTW - I believe that by "government run(down) book lending collective", Collin meant "public library"...
  • LOL Cromulent link. I love that someone took the time to write a wikipedia entry on it.
  • Levinthauer
    Embiggen? It's a perfectly cromulent word.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_the_Iconoclas...
  • Himanshu
    oh well, good work... helped me show some of my juvenile friends that it really was a stupid idea wid lotsa loopholes.. lolz!!
    still i guess d list is a helpful thing nonetheless...
  • Collin, I get what you're saying, about encouraging people to read. But psychology research shows that negative stimuli only work for a very short while. In other words, people may see the insult that accuses them of being ill-read, pick up one book on the list, read half of it, then give up, feeling spiteful. I'm sure there are much more positive reinforcements to get people to read. The biggest indicator of a person's reading habits is set in childhood; if they see their parents reading, they too will read.

    Anyway, all that aside, how did the book lending collective go? What IS a book lending collective? And yes, let's add some great authors to the list, like those you suggest! Are you a short story fan? I tend to like novels more.

    Who else wants to add someone? Any suggestions?
  • I can't see it as a bad thing. The throwing down of some metaphorical gauntlet to get people to read more can only be, ultimately, a good thing. Certainly I with my "communistic" leanings (which I can only interpret as having a desire to cooperate and share) have little spiritual need for shoring up via a collection of tales written by many authors of diverse intention and ability.

    Now I'm off down the government run(down) book lending collective to see what I can get, i hear they might have some Patrick McGrath. Queued round the block I tell you...

    Might I suggest the inclusion of Brett Easton Ellis, Charles Bukowski, and Viktor Pelevin for future lists.
  • cybrgrl
    Heh... you are a woman after my own heart. I recently got the same meme and did a similar investigation. I went ahead and complied with the meme instructions, but I also posted links to the 2 BBC 100 Books lists I found and noted the lack of any claim of how many of the titles people likely have read.
  • And your name is after MY own heart - "cybrgrl" has gotta be one of the coolest names EVER.

    Don't you just love how these internet rumors start? The "Us vs. Them" mentality is so easily triggered.
  • Peter No One
    Interesting read. Cheers on your debunking, but I think you need to put a little more description (research?) into what a meme is... A chain letter is a pretty feeble example of this massive concept. Starting off by stating "A “meme” is a little chain-letter-like game that people send around the internet" is probably not the best starting point...
  • Peter, Thanks for writing. Most readers of my blog already know what a "meme" is. Occasionally I write introductory articles for my readers to share with new users, but for the most part I write for a technical audience. The purpose of this post was to present a case study of a typical meme, not to define what a meme is. But please let us know what your definition of a meme is since you think it is necessary. -PC





    ________________________________
  • Hey guys, just found an article at Yahoo! Books about World Book Day in the UK. Hopefully the original source has more detail about how the data was collected because this article is useless in any scientific sense. Still looking for that original source, but here's another meme in the making, probably entitled "Books you haven't really read even though you claim them in your 100 books list:"

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090305/od_nm/us_bo...

    Most Britons have lied about the books they read

    *
    Buzz Up
    * Send
    o Email
    o IM
    * Share
    o Delicious
    o Digg
    o Facebook
    o Fark
    o Newsvine
    o Reddit
    o StumbleUpon
    o Technorati
    o Yahoo! Bookmarks
    * Print

    Thu Mar 5, 11:44 am ET

    LONDON (Reuters) – Two out of three Britons have lied about reading books they have not, and George Orwell's "1984" tops the literary fib list, according to a survey published Thursday.

    Commissioned by organizers of World Book Day, an annual celebration of reading in Britain, the study also shows that the author people really enjoy reading is J.K. Rowling, creator of the bestselling Harry Potter wizard series.

    According to the survey, 65 percent of people have pretended to have read books, and of those, 42 percent singled out "1984." Next on the list came "War and Peace" by Leo Tolstoy and in third place was James Joyce's "Ulysses."

    The Bible was in fourth position, and newly elected President Barack Obama's autobiography "Dreams from My Father" came ninth.

    Aside from a list of ten titles which respondents were asked to tick or leave blank, many admitted wrongly claiming they had read other "classics" including Jane Austen, the Bronte sisters, Charles Dickens, Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Herman Melville.

    Asked why they had lied about reading a book, the main reason was to impress the person they were speaking to.

    The study, carried out on the World Book Day website in January and February, surveyed 1,342 members of the public.

    Those who lied have claimed to have read:

    1. 1984 - George Orwell (42 percent)

    2. War and Peace - Leo Tolstoy (31)

    3. Ulysses - James Joyce (25)

    4. The Bible (24)

    5. Madame Bovary - Gustave Flaubert (16)

    6. A Brief History of Time - Stephen Hawking (15)

    7. Midnight's Children - Salman Rushdie (14)

    8. In Remembrance of Things Past - Marcel Proust (9)

    9. Dreams from My Father - Barack Obama (6)

    10. The Selfish Gene - Richard Dawkins (6)

    (Reporting by Mike Collett-White)
  • UPDATE: found this source from the BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts_a...

    George Orwell's 1984 and Leo Tolstoy's War and Peace are among the books people are most likely to have lied about reading, according to a poll.

    Two out of three people admitted lying about reading a particular book to impress someone, the survey released to mark World Book Day found.

    Orwell's classic topped the list, with four out of 10 respondents (42%) pretending to have read it.

    And almost a third (31%) said they had lied about reading War and Peace.


    GUILTY SECRETS
    1. 1984 - George Orwell (42%)
    2. War and Peace - Leo Tolstoy (31%)
    3. Ulysses - James Joyce (25%)
    4. The Bible (24%)
    5. Madame Bovary - Gustave Flaubert (16%)
    6. A Brief History of Time - Stephen Hawking (15%)
    7. Midnight's Children - Salman Rushdie (14%)
    8. In Remembrance of Things Past - Marcel Proust (9%)
    9. Dreams from My Father - Barack Obama (6%)
    10. The Selfish Gene - Richard Dawkins (6%)

    A total of 1,342 people took part in the online survey in January and February this year.

    Visitors to the World Book Day website were given a list of 10 books and asked which they had lied about reading.

    Others included The Bible (24%) and US President Barack Obama's memoir Dreams From My Father (6%).

    Many also admit to wrongly claiming to have read the classics, including authors Jane Austen, the Bronte sisters, Charles Dickens, Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Herman Melville.

    Most said they had lied to impress someone.

    Francesca Simon, author of the Horrid Henry children's books recalled: "An Oxford don asked me if I knew Italo Calvino.

    "I said yes, meaning I'd heard of him, but she meant, 'What had I read?' The conversation degenerated from there."

    Asked which authors they really enjoyed reading, more than six out of 10 (61%) chose Harry Potter author JK Rowling, nearly a third (32%) ticked legal thriller writer John Grisham.

    More than a fifth (22%) chose Shopaholic author Sophie Kinsella.

    A further 41% of respondents confessed to turning to the back of a book to read the end before finishing the story and 48% admitted to buying a book for someone else and reading it first.
  • Colette
    I found your site by trying to disprove/prove the BBC claim of 6 books. It seems pretty silly to think that out of 100 books people wouldn't have read at least 6 of them. But the thing that has really caught my eye is that I have now seen 4 different versions of the list. (the original BBC list which was actually a poll of people's favorites in 2003, the list you post on here as the fb list, and 2 other lists from 2 of my fb friends who are not friends themselves). Seems the list is ever-changing.
  • Darling, thanks for this post. I find this meme very annoying and now I can post this link to FB and say, "Buahaha...NOW who's the smartest one??" :)
  • Jacki Berry
    "Embiggen"? I like it... I think.
  • Creek
    Embiggen... Until that word I was simply reading. When you said "embiggen," I was charmed.
  • Thanks Creek!

    I often make up phrases and words (like "To Thoreau" which means to go totally off-line) but "embiggen" I can't take credit for. I saw some other blogger use it a while ago (can't remember who) and I too just loved it. So much more descriptive!

    Peace!
    -PC





    ________________________________
  • Keith Callbeck
    I agree with the statement of why it spreads, but the elaborate conspiracy theory is just creative writing.

    It's World Book Day 2007's list of "100 Books You Can't Live Without". I still haven't turned up a reference to 6 of them being a stat. And it seems unlikely I will as this was a popularity contest.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/mar/01/news
  • Keith, this made me laugh. What do you mean, conspiracy theory? No group conspired to fool the public with these lists. I was showing how memes get started, usually by individuals who are bastardizing something they saw in traditional media realms. Not sure what you mean by popularity contest either, but the World Book Day 2007 link to "100 Books You Can't Live Without" (http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/mar/01/news) is interesting. At first look I can tell there is overlap, but it doesn't look like much. Someone else will have to compare the lists.

    Thanks! -PC





    ________________________________
  • Forrest
    I did the comparison. (Mindless table work relaxes my inner autistic sometimes.)

    The list at http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/mar/01/news matches
    http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/03/01/bbc-bo... ALMOST exactly.
    There is a different spelling or two.
    Numbers 2 and 16 are swapped.
    One list has a "tied for 8th" listing, the other just lists 8 and 9. (Same books, anyway.)
  • Keith Callbeck
    A few more minutes on Google would have turned up the source of the list. Your conspriacy theory is creative, but untrue.

    It's World Book Day 2007's list of "100 Books You Can't Live Without". I still haven't turned up a reference to 6 of them being a stat. And it seems unlikely I will as this was a popularity contest. I agree that the meme exists because it makes us all feel superior as I have yet to turn up any adult who is under the 6 mark.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/mar/01/news
  • Simon
    I’d just seen this questionnaire on someone’s blog, and was similarly sceptical, so was delighted to see you’d written this excellent piece.

    A couple of points: you missed (as I did at first pass) that ‘The Grapes of Wrath’ and ‘The Count of Monte Cristo’ were on both lists because the FMM omitted the definite article.

    Rather embarrassingly, Joseph Conrad’s ‘Hearts of Darkness’ is misspelled on both lists as ‘Heart of Darkness’, while, on a lesser note, the FMM omitted the hyphen from ‘Catch-22’, and used ‘Alice in Wonderland’ rather than the correct title ‘Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland’.

    The list on the BBC’s website runs to 200 books, and if you go into the second hundred, quite a few of the ‘missing’ books can be found. Discounting the awkward individual books versus collections of books, the ones added by the FMM are:

    A Confederacy of Dunces
    Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
    Catcher in the Rye
    Cloud Atlas
    Complete Works of Shakespeare
    Germinal
    Hamlet
    Life of Pi
    Madame Bovary
    Notes From A Small Island
    Sense and Sensibility
    The Bell Jar
    The Bible
    The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time
    The Da Vinci Code
    The Five People You Meet In Heaven
    The Kite Runner
    The Lovely Bones
    The Remains of the Day
    The Shadow of the Wind
    The Three Musketeers
    The Time Traveller's Wife

    …in the unlike event that you’re interested. I can’t guarantee there are no mistakes! It’s quite eye-straining looking through adjacent lists, especially when one is twice as long as the other.

    That no one in the UK should give The Bible as their favourite book is not surprising in our communistic, atheistic society, but I was a little surprised that no one included any of the Sherlock Holmes books. On the other hand, The Da Vinci Code was acknowledged as being really big in the US but less so elsewhere.

    Regarding the ‘more intellectual’ FBB list, it should be remembered that the BBC lists the results of a poll of favourite books, not ‘books you have read’. There’s rather a difference! I’ve read ‘The Grapes of Wrath’, but deeply disliked it.

    I was rather more amused by the BBC’s poll on how many people lied about the books they’d read, in order to impress people:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts_and_culture/7925720.stm

    (Apologies for the length of the comment, by the way.)
  • Who the heck knows what "good literature" is anyway? I think that the list is close enough to agree that its origins are the BBC list. It's easier for a list to degrade over time from it's original rather than a random list growing over time to correlate with another list by 63%.
  • yeah it is screwy, listing series of books instead of one book, etc. It's probably gone through a bunch of iterations. Probably each person who got it added books they've read and deleted some they didn't!
  • The BBC list from Dykeman's article is screwy, they list The Chronicles of Narnia, then they list "The Lion, the Witch and the Warddrobe". They also list both Hamlet and "The Complete works of William Shakespeare".

    This certainly sounds like a silly meme, as many of these literary classics haven't been required reading for a long time. This reminds me of the controversy caused by the release of the Modern Library 100 Greatest Books of all time list, which had most readers in something of an uproar.
  • I've never heard of the Modern Library 100 Greatest Books of all Time list. You wouldnt' happen to have a link that you could share with us, would you?
  • Kitty, I'm guessing Greg was talking about this:

    http://www.randomhouse.com/modernlibrary/100bes... (I don't remember hearing about it either. But then again, I don't remember much.) This link goes to randomhouse, a publisher, so ... ya know... take it with a HUGE grain of salt.


    -PC




    ________________________________
  • Forrest
    Based on the junk in both lists, neither comes from anyone seriously interested or competent in encouraging appreciation of good literature. For example, Dahl is great satire, but how many books do you need to appreciate him?
    But based on the quality in both lists, they weren't a random selection.
    A different primary source is possible (and I say likely.)

    Google search of Dahl Dickens Orwell 1999 comes up with a similar list which predates the BBC's 2003 dating. Going back further years might be fruitful. But google is no good for serious archiveology [sic]. I don't know what is.
  • Pete
    This meme did the rounds about six months back in a different form, but is now blistering through my friendslist as well. It seemed suspect to me too and I found that someone managed to do some detective work on it's initial outbreak - http://rabidpaladin.com/archive/2008/06/25/book...

    I don't mind this meme so much, it's had all my friends talking about what they have, haven't & wished they'd read, but it's interesting what gets passed around without anyone questioning the source.
  • Pete, STELLAR LINK: http://rabidpaladin.com/archive/2008/06/25/book... Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Seems Book Geek came up with similar info. Also I notice they couldn't resist the temptation to credential the list (i.e. inform us of which books they've read). It's quite the irresistible pull, I admit, but falling into it just perpetuates the elitism.

    A list made by a committee made up of supremely qualified people would gain more respect but these lists have no legitimacy in that regard. Hence it is for fun only. Well, as much fun as it is to justify ourselves to the public out of insecurity and imaginary scrutiny.

    -PC
  • Absolutely fascinating that the FBB list is considerably more intellectual than the BBC list shakespeare, hardy and margaret atwood vs terry pratchett and roald dahl

    plus the inclusion of the bible is a bit of a North American give away. Brits are usually pretty glad to be godless

    Oh and sorry to be a smarty pants but you've got the count of monte cristo in both lists ;)
  • Alan, interesting that you see the FB list as more intellectual. Maybe. That just adds to the competition/elitism aspect of it. Yeah "The Bible" ... I have to say, that one was a bit annoying to me. Reading the Bible as literature is tough and would require a class, IMHO. It's similar to Canterbury Tales in that sense.

    Thanks for the Count of Monte Cristo catch. I can't see all of the details by myself, I rely on people like you to throw me a hint once in a while! Thanks. I made the corrections. -PC
  • Julie
    I suspected something similar and found your post in my search to confirm it. I think your hypothesis was pretty good, but I discovered the source of the actual list, which is different than the Big Read list you posted. I just posted the following note to my Facebook profile (http://www.facebook.com/note.php?created&&sugge...), because a lot of my friends are posting that meme:

    I started seeing the “BBC Top 100 Books” meme around Facebook over the last couple weeks, but the "BBC doesn't think you've read more than six of these" part didn't sit right with me. Apparently others agreed. Someone at purplecar.net, went so far as to post a case study of this particular meme.

    http://www.purplecar.net/2009/03/02/how-do-meme...

    Here’s the BBC Big Read 100 List that she mentions in her article http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/bigread/top100.shtml -- it was done in 2003.

    However, the list in the meme is quite different than the BBC Big Read list where she thinks it started. I thought there might be a list that was closer to the one in the meme. So, I did a little online sleuthing.

    First I found this article http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/640573... that mentions a World Book Day survey in 2007 of 100 books Brits can’t live without. And then I found the complete list on The Guardian’s website -- http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/mar/01/news Mystery solved -- it’s the same list as the one in the meme.

    So, feel free to see how many of those hundred books you’ve read. As a reader, I always find it fun. However, know that the BBC isn’t judging you. The only thing you'll discover is if you’ve read the same books that a bunch of people in the UK couldn't live without.

    So, there you go…
  • Someone else pointed out to me that the origins of this meme were somewhat suspect; unfortunately, it was after I had written and posted my response. Oh well. At least it has spurred some interesting discussion!

    And yes, reading should definitely be positive and inclusive.
  • Mark, everything on the internet is suspect! But that doesn't mean that memes can't be fun. This one is harmless for the most part, and maybe it will shame some people into reading a book! (Just kidding!)
  • In theory, it should help with that, but all it's likely to do is perpetrate the spread of more memes. I can say that out of all of the books on the BBC list, I've only read all the way through 9 of them (To Kill a Mockingbird and a few of the Discworld books).
  • Will, memes are ok. I just don't like the reasons some spread. No evidence is apparent that the BBC insulted the world's english-reading population. No reason to get up ganders and all that. It's ok if the meme spreads as long as people realize that these things are often started on pretense.
  • Interesting post. Good detective work.

    I did notice that one of favorites, The Grapes of Wrath, is on the BBC list and FMM list of 40.
  • You know, I thought I saw that too but I couldn't seem to find it later on. Good catch.

    I hated that book. I didn't finish it. Maybe this was a Freudian slip. I'll make corrections.
  • lfamous
    I see your point about the list becoming an "I'm better than you" challenge. But I'm always looking for reading recommendations, so I copied and pasted to see what I've read.

    I've read 26 of them. It's funny, I know I read Dickens in high school (and obviously seen a few movies of his books), but I couldn't tell you what book(s) of his I actually read.

    One of the books I have up in the attic. Now I'm tempted to bring it down & actually read it!
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: