How Do Memes Start? A Case Study: 100 Books in Facebook.

by Christine Cavalier on 2 March 2009

A “meme” is a little chain-letter-like game that people send around the internet.  You may have heard of Facebook’s latest meme “25 Things” (that was started by users, not the Facebook staff).

Ever wonder how these memes begin?

Let’s use the 100 Book meme that is hitting Facebook this week.  It’s a good study on how memes get started, how they change over time, and how they grow.

I just caught this from FriendFeed user Mark Dykeman:

“This is one of those Facebook memes that keeps circling around the universe.  I answered it on Facebook, but since some of you might not have access to my Facebook account, I thought I’d post the results here.

‘The BBC believes the majority of people will have only read 6 of the 100 books here.
Go to your profile, choose notes, post a new note – copy and edit.

Instructions: Look at the list and put an ‘x’ after those you have read.’”

Mark goes ahead and checks off the books he’s read on the list.  It’s more than 6.  The list is below, but hang here with me for a second.

Before you get your feathers ruffled about the audacity and snobbery of the BBC, let’s take a better look at this.

I looked for the origin of the meme by checking urban-myth-busting site Snopes and the BBC website.  Snopes had nothing about how the BBC supposedly claimed that most people will have read only 6 books on the entire list.  Snopes usually catches rumors quickly, but they don’t necessarily investigate every silly Facebook meme.  Personally, I doubt the BBC would have said that, but let’s be honest:  They’ve said worse.

On the BBC site I found no quotes, articles, or any mention whatsoever about the 6 book number; I did find the BBC’s BIG READ list where they list 100 books and they ask UK’ers to vote on their favorites.  Both the list from the Facebook meme and the BBC’s Big Read list look similar.  Could they be the same list?

So I stuck them in a spreadsheet and compared.   63 of the books are shared;  37 of the books are not.

Here is the shared list (click to embiggen):

63 FB List titles on left, 63 BBC List titles on right.  This list contains exactly the same books, with titles edited.

63 FB List titles on left, 63 BBC List titles on right. This list contains exactly the same books, with titles edited.

You’ll notice some of the book titles are written slightly differently, which implies more editing by the clever meme maker (who’ll we’ll refer to as the Facebook Meme Maker -FMM) that adjusted the original BBC list.  (With the Facebook Meme’s “Harry Potter Series” entry, I just used the first Harry Potter book.  Same with “The Faraway Tree Collection.”  In a list of 100 books, it’s confusing to reference a series.)

So this table (click on it then zoom in to see better) contains the 63 shared titles.  That means 37 titles were deleted and new ones added by the Facebook Meme Maker.

Here are the remaining 37 titles from the Facebook meme next to the original 37 from BBC list (click to embiggen):

37 FB List titles on left, 37 BBC List titles on right.  The lists don't share titles.

37 FB List titles on left, 37 BBC List titles on right. The lists don't share titles.

Seems like FMM preferred more American authors and books that were later adapted into successful movies.  Maybe FMM heard some rumor that the BBC was dissing American authors and readers and felt like putting some of her/his own favorites on the list.  Who knows?

But this meme has some of the great signs of a viral commodity:

1. The meme’s subject is elitist in that it says something about the user’s level of intelligence. (“What? You haven’t read War and Peace?!)  This fosters (usually friendly) competition amongst friends.

2. The meme has a whiff of injustice that stirs up indignance. (“How DARE the BBC say that?! GIMME THAT LIST!”)

3. Filling out / answering the meme doesn’t take much time.  “Put an X by the books you’ve read.”

4. 100 books is perfect.  A nice, big milestone number.  “16 Things” (which I filled out) didn’t take off on Facebook but “25 Things” did.  People gravitate toward milestone, lucky, and zero-ending numbers in this culture.  No-one will look at an “82 Books You Need to Read” list.  “100″ grabs everyone’s attention.

The FMM probably saw the BBC list and wondered how many of the books she/he had actually read.  Out of curiosity, the FMM checked off which book titles were familiar.  Perhaps when the number of recognized titles were low, the FMM decided to add the ones she/he did in fact read.  What followed was an email or two, with bragging evidence attached, of course, to a few dozen friends on Facebook.  Voila!  A meme is born.

People who successfully ignore memes will be sucked into this one for the false academic quality of it.  It’s about traditional literacy; We all take the “How Well Read Are You?” measurement quite seriously.

I myself am trying to work on being better read.  With all the hype about how the internet and tv are melting our brains, this meme is a zinger.  It feeds all the fear surrounding the changes in our culture.  It will most likely take off and get so big that Snopes will have to post on it.

Now you know how memes like this start.  And you also know why I’m not going to be sucked in.  It’s a hoax created by a smart FMM who blended some pop culture news story from half-way across the world into a pride-ruffling insult that must be disproved immediately by the educated American masses.  Have fun with it if you like, but please don’t spread the indignant attitude.  Reading itself should be a positive and inclusive activity.

____________________________________

UPDATE 17 November 2010: Please read through the comments, there is a lot of new information scattered in there. Thanks.

UPDATE 22 November 2010: If you liked this article, you make like these others I’ve written about Facebook:
How IDs work in Facebook: http://www.purplecar.net/2010/02/facebookphishingscam/,

Dear Abby Talks About FB http://www.purplecar.net/2010/07/kids-with-multiple-facebook-profiles/,

Ack! My In-Laws are on FB: http://www.purplecar.net/2010/08/the-in-laws-and-facebook/

UPDATE: MARCH 1 2011 Comments on this post are now closed.

More posts like this one:

  • Pingback: 100 Toronto Books You Should Read « Imagining Toronto

  • Pingback: Definition of “Meme” | PurpleCar

  • http://www.purplecar.net/ PurpleCar

    OK, here’s the post on meme, complete with a definition and history of the word. I also add my reasoning for the use of “chain-letter like” in this post. http://www.purplecar.net/2010/12/definition-of-meme/

  • Pingback: Defining New Words: Watch The Traffic! « Philadelphia Stories Weblog

  • http://www.sueskimo.blogspot.comm Sueskimo

    Ha! Ha! Just like you said this is now doing the rounds of my old uni friends and yes there is an element of competition especially between the scientists ( we need to prove we can read something other than a textbook) and the linguists ( who always felt they were superior to us!! :) )
    I noticed the penchant for books into films on the FB list but as I am so strange in my reading habits discovered to my delight that I am so well read I should be at Oxford!
    We are all soooo gullible – we really need to feel we are doing OK by some standard or other. I tottally agree – redaing shlud be for enjoyment not because you ought to have “done” a worthy book.
    As I disappear into The Hemlock Cup – Bettany Hughes book about Socrates which is great but not exactly bedtime reading; and listen to Percy Jackson and the Titan’s curse…..books are a joy!

  • http://www.purplecar.net/ PurpleCar

    I love listening to books, by the way. I LOVED the Harry Potter series on CD. I
    had read the books, and hearing them read was amazing. Also, the actor that read
    Stieg Larsson’s Millennium Trilogy was superb.

    But yes, back to being sucked in, in a negative way… we are all so, SO
    gullible, as you said. Maybe it’s old media tradition, how we all just were
    trained to believe what we read in the paper. I find the older generations are
    even worse at this. For example, I remember when we had to explain something to
    my inlaws about rehearsal dinners, specifically that it was traditional to allow
    wedding party members to bring one guest to the rehearsal dinner. They didn’t
    believe us until we showed them a paragraph stating so in a wedding etiquette
    book. Nowadays, you can get any book that says any darn thing that suits your
    needs, especially if you print off some of the self-published drivel in the
    non-fiction section of any e-book store.

    And now that the conglomerates behind traditional news sources have been
    revealed, it’s more and more evident that we must find original sources
    ourselves. Seeing something printed and re-printed makes no difference any more.
    We must find trusted sources and make judgments based on those and any other
    source. This is a flawed system, of course, but we don’t have much choice.

    I’m glad you are one of the people that does look for original info. In doing so
    myself, I found that this meme held a false claim, and I could then let others
    know to stop the culture war they were beginning to wage in their heads against
    the BBC. God help us when false information leads to real wars… oh wait… God
    help us now.

    -Christine Cavalier

    Peace!
    -PurpleCar
    http://www.purplecar.net/

  • Pingback: A New Year’s Resolution of sorts « Chaotically Me

  • Pingback: Turning over a new leaf

  • Daire

    It was the Sunday Times Book List that people have only read 6 of – about 2 years ago?!

  • http://www.purplecar.net/ PurpleCar

    Daire, yes it seems as though a list was in The Guardian over two years ago, but it was not the same list. Plus, don’t think that paper claimed that people have read only 6.
    Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android

  • strange mother

    Mmm – I came to this list only recently and sure enough despite ‘never’ doing this kind of survey, I took it and have been just a bit obsessed since – even though I know that this is far from the only ‘top 100 books list’ out there and definitely not the UK and possibly young reader biased BBC list of favourites from 2003 ‘Big read’ (which actually goes up to 200 anyway). So despite the fact it is silly I’m now up to 93 titles on the list (do I really need to know so much about the 19th C sperm whaling industry?) and am just a bit troubled about how I’m going to go about reading the whole Bible to achieve 100…

  • http://www.purplecar.net/ PurpleCar

    LOL Hi Strange Mother.
    You sound like you should make your own 100 books lists! Why not write us up one
    for young adult, kids, adults, and classics, with international books? You seem
    very well read.

    I grew up in Catholic school so I’ve read the entire Bible in depth. Some parts
    many times. Psalms is probably the best written, the Gospel of Luke probably the
    least fact-based. Anyway, I’m good. 12 years of it was enough.

    Please make some notes and get back to us! I totally understand your obsession,
    as the Pulitzer list is just as random and I feel like I should read all of
    those.

    -Christine Cavalier

  • C3678859

    Learn what a meme is.

  • http://www.purplecar.net/ PurpleCar

    Wow, some of you are having a really hard time understanding this. Either that,
    or this commenter did not read through the comments.

    I posit that there are not enough words to sufficiently address the current
    needs of the tech community. Meme, to me, denotes participation. “Viral internet
    phenomenon” is not a meme, although “meme” is being applied to that definition.
    One could postulate that watching or even just receiving a meme is in fact
    participation, and I get that, but we need a word that includes the definition
    of more active involvement instead of passive participation. One other could
    postulate that meme is a word with multiple definitions. I say we all agree to
    this, for now.

    I suggest you read more of my blog and the comments before you comment on blog
    posts.

  • http://holynpoly.blogspot.com emmdee

    If my understanding of where the lists came from is right (Big Read/World Book Day) – they were voted for by the UK public (not sure if there was a completely free vote of there was a longer list of nominations). The Big Read had celebrities nominating and extolling their favorites on TV and radio for the public to vote on.

  • http://www.purplecar.net/ PurpleCar

    emmdee,

    that introduces a really interesting element – celebrity. Who we identify with
    as celebrities has a huge influence on our decision-making. I would guess more
    people would read what Angelina Jolie reads than say Annie Proulx, Anne Lamott
    or Collum McCann, even though the latter three would be considered more literary
    experts than movie-star Angelina Jolie. Yet another reason to take these types
    of lists as a popular notion more than an academic one.

    -Christine Cavalier

  • Anonymous

    What a interesting books………

    Free Dating

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_43KXY56X7PU34GBRZXXP5RRLQE Samuel David

    it looks like a spam. unwanted messages. but it is fun to pass around.
    free dating

  • Walkiria Truss

    I really tought abaut what you´re saying when I answered that, there was some titles that I ask “why is this here?” But I thoght the list with that kind of literature could be more opened to that ones who read only bestsellers, no matter if they´re great books, self-help sells lots of books. But it´s interesting to just remember that television is not the only thing that exist in the world. Your text is very cleaver and really makes us think about reading. Congratulations.

  • http://twitter.com/Grimeandreason Ben King

    Oh man that definition up top of meme makes me bristle. In one hundred years time cultural evolution through memetic, or whatever the fuck you wanna call it, will be recognised as significant as genetic evolution; it is what makes us, us.

    Without memes there would be no identity. We would be animals of pure instinct. Memes are all human-made products, all language, all artifacts, all culture. They are the basis for our morality, the vehicle of our progression, the network from which History emerges. When shared, they are what give us our humanity; when not, our inhumanity.

    Dawkins name will go down with Darwin’s as the two most influential individuals to avow and propogate evolutionary ideas. Once humanity comes to understand the power of the meme, the will simultaneously understand the conceptual darkness humanity has suffered under, the false notions of the self, the soul and external, interpretable moral codes born of a time of memetic darkness, where the ‘other’ prowled relentlessly and power was held by the few over all civilisation.

    We are now coming out of that darkness, the illusion of ‘other’ dissapating before our global eyes. We will soon recognise our true responsibilities and our true sense of self with a complex network of equal individuals.

  • http://www.purplecar.net/ PurpleCar

    That was intense.

    Peace!
    -PurpleCar
    http://www.purplecar.net/

  • http://www.purplecar.net/ PurpleCar

    Thanks, Walkiria!

    Peace!
    -PurpleCar
    http://www.purplecar.net/

  • Pingback: Home Page

  • Pingback: The BBC believes most people will have read only 6 of the 100 books here. How many have you read?

  • Lady Odcar

    embiggen is not a word – you mean enlarge

  • http://www.purplecar.net/ PurpleCar

    Yes, you are correct, “embiggen” is not a word. I used it as a joke. It’s a
    common joke among geeky types on the web.

    thanks for the head’s up though!

    Peace!
    -PurpleCar
    http://www.purplecar.net/

  • Pingback: How many of these books have you read? – NightHawk

  • Pingback: Why do we believe hoaxes? | martinturner.org.uk

  • Pingback: You Don't Say: That bogus BBC book list - English grammar, language, usage and journalism blog by John E. McIntyre - baltimoresun.com

  • Pingback: Must Read lists « Magpieschest's Weblog

  • Pingback: Kort møte: Boklista til BBC

  • Pingback: BBC Facebook App Designed to Make You Feel Stupid and Bad About Yourself | Death and Taxes

  • Pingback: Memes and me (or should that be ‘I’?) « How Did I Get Here?

  • Pingback: How well read are you? «

  • Pingback: Boeken — Michel Vuijlsteke's Weblog

  • Pingback: PurpleCar: How Do Memes Start? A Case Study: 100 Books in Facebook. | Mademoiselle H

  • Pingback: What's up Liz: Books Before you Die

  • Pingback: What’s a meme?! « Progress and Procrastination

  • Pingback: 100 Books: A short rant and a long post « Reading Together

  • Pingback: The BBC believes most people will have read only 6 of the 100 books here. How do your reading habits stack up? « The Life of Umm

  • Pingback: Turning over a new leaf | Molly Flatt

  • Pingback: Just for Fun

  • Pingback: ONTD_LITERATURE - Booklist Challenge

  • Pingback: The BBC believes most people will have read only 6 of the 100 books here. How many have you read?

  • Pingback: Aspirations and other problems | Seven Day Fool

  • Pingback: Lola Life: What I've been reading

Previous post:

Next post: