<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Missing Golden Opportunity to Win Friends, Families.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.purplecar.net/2009/12/google-missing-golden-opportunity-to-win-friends-families/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2009/12/google-missing-golden-opportunity-to-win-friends-families/</link>
	<description>A Taxi Service for Big Ideas. Home of book podcast PurpleCar Park.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:18:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PurpleCar</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2009/12/google-missing-golden-opportunity-to-win-friends-families/comment-page-1/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>PurpleCar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=708#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>Mike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for pointing that out. I didn&#039;t see it, and I&#039;m sure the little ones don&#039;t either. They should just move it to the top. What&#039;s so hard?&lt;br&gt;They&#039;d still miss a good tax shelter (donate space to an educational non-profit or a .gov site) if they just linked to their own definition, but moving it to the top to a sponsored link position would be a great thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for catching what I didn&#039;t!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-PC&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;________________________________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing that out. I didn&#39;t see it, and I&#39;m sure the little ones don&#39;t either. They should just move it to the top. What&#39;s so hard?<br />They&#39;d still miss a good tax shelter (donate space to an educational non-profit or a .gov site) if they just linked to their own definition, but moving it to the top to a sponsored link position would be a great thing.</p>
<p>Thanks for catching what I didn&#39;t!</p>
<p>-PC</p>
<p>________________________________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2009/12/google-missing-golden-opportunity-to-win-friends-families/comment-page-1/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=708#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>Google actually does link to the definition of the search word, over on the right-hand side of the page. But in the context of your point, it&#039;s really not the first thing a user&#039;s eyes are drawn to. They could make it more prominent. Click that link, it takes the user to Google&#039;s own dictionary, where a definition with no pictures is shown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google actually does link to the definition of the search word, over on the right-hand side of the page. But in the context of your point, it&#39;s really not the first thing a user&#39;s eyes are drawn to. They could make it more prominent. Click that link, it takes the user to Google&#39;s own dictionary, where a definition with no pictures is shown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PurpleCar</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2009/12/google-missing-golden-opportunity-to-win-friends-families/comment-page-1/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>PurpleCar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=708#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting, Edy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love me the semantic web and customized search as much as the next guy, but what do we do until then? Also, kids use Google. It would take a while for us all to get ourselves weaned off Google, especially the less-than-7-years-old set. And this really is about Google squeezing the good karma juice out of this, and Symantec making some money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-PC&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;________________________________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting, Edy.</p>
<p>I love me the semantic web and customized search as much as the next guy, but what do we do until then? Also, kids use Google. It would take a while for us all to get ourselves weaned off Google, especially the less-than-7-years-old set. And this really is about Google squeezing the good karma juice out of this, and Symantec making some money.</p>
<p>-PC</p>
<p>________________________________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edythemighty</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2009/12/google-missing-golden-opportunity-to-win-friends-families/comment-page-1/#comment-1565</link>
		<dc:creator>edythemighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=708#comment-1565</guid>
		<description>How&#039;s about we build a better search engine that doesn&#039;t rely on Google flawed pagerank algorithm? How&#039;s about a search engine that actually gives you a structured definition of the word, taken from various sources of the internets, and then links to those sources?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#39;s about we build a better search engine that doesn&#39;t rely on Google flawed pagerank algorithm? How&#39;s about a search engine that actually gives you a structured definition of the word, taken from various sources of the internets, and then links to those sources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PurpleCar</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2009/12/google-missing-golden-opportunity-to-win-friends-families/comment-page-1/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>PurpleCar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=708#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>Mike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for pointing that out. I didn&#039;t see it, and I&#039;m sure the little ones don&#039;t either. They should just move it to the top. What&#039;s so hard?&lt;br&gt;They&#039;d still miss a good tax shelter (donate space to an educational non-profit or a .gov site) if they just linked to their own definition, but moving it to the top to a sponsored link position would be a great thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for catching what I didn&#039;t!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-PC&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;________________________________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing that out. I didn&#39;t see it, and I&#39;m sure the little ones don&#39;t either. They should just move it to the top. What&#39;s so hard?<br />They&#39;d still miss a good tax shelter (donate space to an educational non-profit or a .gov site) if they just linked to their own definition, but moving it to the top to a sponsored link position would be a great thing.</p>
<p>Thanks for catching what I didn&#39;t!</p>
<p>-PC</p>
<p>________________________________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2009/12/google-missing-golden-opportunity-to-win-friends-families/comment-page-1/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=708#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>Google actually does link to the definition of the search word, over on the right-hand side of the page. But in the context of your point, it&#039;s really not the first thing a user&#039;s eyes are drawn to. They could make it more prominent. Click that link, it takes the user to Google&#039;s own dictionary, where a definition with no pictures is shown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google actually does link to the definition of the search word, over on the right-hand side of the page. But in the context of your point, it&#39;s really not the first thing a user&#39;s eyes are drawn to. They could make it more prominent. Click that link, it takes the user to Google&#39;s own dictionary, where a definition with no pictures is shown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PurpleCar</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2009/12/google-missing-golden-opportunity-to-win-friends-families/comment-page-1/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>PurpleCar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=708#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting, Edy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love me the semantic web and customized search as much as the next guy, but what do we do until then? Also, kids use Google. It would take a while for us all to get ourselves weaned off Google, especially the less-than-7-years-old set. And this really is about Google squeezing the good karma juice out of this, and Symantec making some money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-PC&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;________________________________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting, Edy.</p>
<p>I love me the semantic web and customized search as much as the next guy, but what do we do until then? Also, kids use Google. It would take a while for us all to get ourselves weaned off Google, especially the less-than-7-years-old set. And this really is about Google squeezing the good karma juice out of this, and Symantec making some money.</p>
<p>-PC</p>
<p>________________________________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edythemighty</title>
		<link>http://www.purplecar.net/2009/12/google-missing-golden-opportunity-to-win-friends-families/comment-page-1/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>edythemighty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purplecar.net/?p=708#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>How&#039;s about we build a better search engine that doesn&#039;t rely on Google flawed pagerank algorithm? How&#039;s about a search engine that actually gives you a structured definition of the word, taken from various sources of the internets, and then links to those sources?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#39;s about we build a better search engine that doesn&#39;t rely on Google flawed pagerank algorithm? How&#39;s about a search engine that actually gives you a structured definition of the word, taken from various sources of the internets, and then links to those sources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
