≡ Menu

Define Introducation: Fun with Twitter

Those of you that don’t “get” Twitter aren’t having fun with us avid Tweeters. I could spend days on Twitter with my clever and snappy (and sometimes hilariously grumpy) crew.  My “Tweeps” provide me with distraction and comfort, humor and support. During yesterday’s 24 mile ride that included BikeDC, my Twitter people were right there with me, awaiting my pictures and updates on how close I was to the finish line. Today, I’m under a bit of pressure to get some writing done on deadline. I was just writing through one of those desperate, eye-strain moments a few minutes ago. My eyes started watering, my head is heavy with allergies and I feel like I could go to sleep right now. Obviously I need to get up and get a glass of milk (or coffee!), and I’ll do that. But I needed more than a break after I wrote a sentence so full of typos that it looked like I wasn’t writing in English; I needed a little encouragement. When “Introduction” came out on the screen as “Introducation,” I just stopped and realized it was time for that break and playful jab.

I popped over to Twitter and posted this tweet:

in-tro-duh-CA-tion

Define "Introducation" pls.

Within minutes, my witty friends online answered the call:

Introducation responses

Great Tweeters Don't All Think Alike

How great are they? Just the pick-me-up I needed!

You can follow these witty people on Twitter here: @Sheepthemoon, @MariAdkins, @victorcajiao, @motownmutt, @Curiosity63, @martin_english

And please add your own definitions in the comments. 🙂

-Christine Cavalier

0 comments

More Cell Phones For Children

I have a commentary article in the Philadelphia Inquirer today. You can pick it up in print if you are in the area or you can read it online here: http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20100430_New_phones_mean_more_children_online.html

Come back and let me know what you think!

-Christine Cavalier

Here is the article, reprinted:

Mobile devices are linking kids to social networking.

By Christine Cavalier

Last month, my husband and I bought a cell phone for our daughter. She is 9 years old.

Our daughter is among the 22 percent of the country’s grade-school kids who own a cell phone, according to C&R Research. By the time she reaches middle school, 60 percent or more of her friends will have caught up. And these numbers are going up by the minute.

In her first few hours of cell-phone ownership, our daughter exchanged more than 80 text messages with her best friend. We advised her friend’s parents to change their plan.

Apparently, these two 9-year-olds aren’t alone. Verizon executive Harry Martin said at a press event this month that the network is fielding 162 billion text messages per quarter. That’s 648 billion text messages a year on Verizon alone. “That’s why many people are moving to unlimited text plans,” Martin said.

Verizon unveiled a few new phones at the event. I noticed one small phone, square with rounded corners, that could fit in the palm of my hand. It was the not-yet-released Kin 2 by Microsoft. It has a Windows operating system that is so totally integrated with social-networking sites that you wonder if it’s a phone at all.

I could almost hear the “It’s so cute!” shrieks from my daughter and her cohorts. As soon as you see the miniature phone, you can tell its true market is children – children with their own Facebook accounts. When you visit the Kin Web site, you’re bombarded with well-produced videos of teens and young adults having fun and posting pictures to social-networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace. The slogan “The more you share, the more you get” flashes across the screen.

Our daughter doesn’t have her own Facebook account, but she uses mine to play Farmville, a popular game by the ubiquitous developer Zynga. I’ve seen at least three of the kids in her fourth-grade homeroom on Facebook, despite the site guideline that no one under 13 should have an account.

What’s a parent to do? Worrying about texting seems positively quaint when compared to the pitfalls of social networking. We don’t want strangers texting our kid, but that’s far less likely than the possibility that our daughter will develop an inappropriate “sharing” habit via social networking. These new phones, marketed directly to her age group, will take the meaning of “too much information” to a whole new, grade-school level.

My husband and I have stanched the bleeding for now by buying our daughter a “locked-down” phone that can’t access the Internet. Although she could rack up big bills by downloading videos and music from the Verizon site (Martin says they have 38 million such downloads a quarter), she can’t visit Facebook or any other Web site with it. In a few years, though, she’ll be asking for an Internet-enabled device.

We’ll take the risk. We want her to be able to call us in an emergency. (Of course, her current “emergencies” are missing the activity bus or wanting to go to a friend’s house after school.)

Our parental anxieties about bad guys lurking around every corner keep us wanting more and more of an electronic connection with our offspring – despite the lack of statistical support for those anxieties. According to Prevent Child Abuse, 70 to 90 percent of sexual abuse of children is perpetrated by someone they know.

Social networking could be a more serious risk than strangers. As our daughter charts her life with pictures and videos, she’ll face the possibility of more public embarrassment, harassment, prejudice, and stupidity in one year than we’ve experienced in our whole lives. The more she shares, the more she’ll get.

Before our daughter gets the Internet in her pocket, contracts will be signed. I’m not talking about contracts with Verizon; I mean contracts between her and us. SafeKids.com offers two contracts setting down expected behavior for kids as well as parents. Kids agree to things like “I will not give out personal information,” and parents agree to “not overreact if my child tells me about a problem he or she is having on the Internet.”

We’ll be presenting the contracts to our daughter to cover her online time at home and, eventually, on a mobile phone. We had many dinnertime discussions prior to getting her current cell phone. Our mantra was that it’s our job to keep her safe, and hers to be open and honest with us about any problems. In the end, we told her, it’s about trust. The more she shares, the more she’ll get.

1 comment

PurpleCar Park: Interview with Author Daniel H. Pink

NYT best-selling author Daniel H. Pink stops in to talk about his new book, DRiVE. We talk about why companies are stuck in the 1950s when it comes to reward and motivation theories. Find out what a “For Benefit” company is, why Wikipedia and open source are so huge, and what you can do to motivate yourself and your employees in the best way possible.

Interview: Author of DRiVE: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us, Daniel H. Pink

You can find out more about this book and others by Daniel Pink at his website, http://www.danpink.com/.

Intro of PurpleCar Park provided by The Matthew Show. Check out the independent and intelligent music website at http://www.thematthewshow.com/.

PurpleCar Park:

Woah there, Speedy! Slow down and pull over to PurpleCar Park, a podcast where you can settle in to author interviews, book reviews, and discussion about the act of reading and writing in our super-fast, hyper-digital world.

Unlike most book reviewers and author interviewers in traditional media and on the internet, I take the time to read and study the book. Listen in and you’ll notice the difference. Welcome to PurpleCar Park!

4 comments
c-span panel screen shot

Click to watch

A great, but heady panel from The National Book Critics Circle.

Here’s the description:

Panelists discussed the differences between books reviews and literary criticism. They examined such issues as academic vs. popular reviewing and whether there has been a decline in true literary criticism. They also took questions from the audience.

To watch the video (1 hour, 22 minutes long), click here.

This is for book reviewers and academics only. It’s serious book geekdom, for realz.

0 comments

Facebook Phish: For Geeks Only

This will probably bring internet flotsam to my site, but I thought you expert geeks out there might want to see the long headers (and raw source, just for fun) of the Facebook phishing email I just found in my Inbox. I received three different phishing attempts, but I just chose this one at random. I’m sure they were all similar. Click to see all the lovely, spammy code.

(If you aren’t a geek but you are a Facebook user, you can check out the email to see an example of yet another phishing scam. Remember: Facebook won’t ever reset your password without you initiating the reset first.)

[continue reading…]

6 comments